rotator
rotator
rotator
rotator

State and Local Leaders Fight to Derail Texas Central Railway’s High-Speed Land Grab

Key state lawmakers signal strong support for a Grimes County ordinance to prevent a foreign-owned high-speed rail company from compromising access to county roadways. 

 

AUSTIN, TX — On Tuesday, the Grimes County Commissioners Court voted unanimously to require high-speed rail developers to provide sufficient proof of their eminent domain authority and acquire a county permit before constructing a rail line over county roads.  Similar draft ordinances are already circulating among half a dozen counties that stand to be impacted by Texas Central Railway’s (TCR) proposed high-speed rail line connecting Dallas and Houston, and most are anticipated to pass in the weeks ahead.

“This ill-conceived high-speed rail proposal by a group of Japanese investors threatens to seize family farms, physically divide the state of Texas, and have a gravely detrimental impact on the citizens I represent,” said State Representative Leighton Schubert (R-Caldwell). “At a minimum, the people of Grimes County deserve reasonable reassurances that their private property rights will be respected, and their access to county roads will be maintained.”

In July, the Surface Transportation Board dealt a substantial blow to Texas Central’s high-speed rail proposal, determining the federal government lacked the authority to grant eminent domain powers to TCR or otherwise regulate the proposed high-speed train.  Since then, it’s become increasingly unclear whether TCR has the actual legal authority to take land from private property owners along the train’s proposed path or regulatory framework necessary to operate a high-speed train in Texas.  So far, however, that murky legal authority hasn’t stopped Texas Central from strong-arming rural landowners with threats to either give up their land voluntarily or risk losing it through a future condemnation lawsuit.

Both sides are expected to seek clarification from the state regarding eminent domain and the overall regulation of high-speed rail when the Texas Legislature reconvenes in January 2017.

“Texans are proud of their heritage and the Texas Legislature has a proud tradition of standing up for the rights of private landowners,” said Senator Charles Schwertner (R-Georgetown).  “Texas leaders like Governor Greg Abbott and Lt. Governor Dan Patrick have never wavered in their defense of rural landowners and have both fought to defend Texans’ private property rights since their first days in office.  I fully expect that they, and other Texas conservatives, will ultimately see this foreign land-grab for what it is.”

Senator Brian Birdwell (R-Granbury) expressed similar doubts about Texas Central Railway’s plan to operate a high-speed train between Dallas and Houston without any apparent regulation from state or federal authorities.

“So far, all we have seen is a group pushing to seize property from Texas landowners under the guise of an eminent domain authority they don’t have,” said Senator Birdwell.  “We’re talking about building a virtually impassible barrier of berms and fencing across 240 miles of privately-owned Texas land—are we really suggesting that a project of that magnitude should move forward without any input or direction from the people’s elected representatives?”

In addition to the brewing controversies over eminent domain and the general regulation of high speed rail, a number of questions remain unanswered regarding the specific details of Texas Central’s proposal.  While TCR has claimed that the project will cost just $10 billion to complete, an independent analysis from the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) puts that estimate at closer to $18 billion.

Critics have also raised grave concerns about the overall financial viability of the project, noting that without some form of government subsidy, Texas Central will find it virtually impossible to meet their stated ridership estimates at prices competitive with existing modes of transportation.

“Frankly, the numbers just don’t seem to add up,” said State Representative Trent Ashby (R-Lufkin), who serves as a budget-writer on the powerful House Appropriations Committee.  “To my knowledge, there isn’t a high-speed train on the planet that’s capable of operating without a government subsidy, and until I see evidence to the contrary, I have no reason to believe this one will be any different.  At the end of the day, I don’t believe the majority of Texans are willing to pay higher taxes in order to subsidize a private project meant to benefit Japanese investors.”

The current conflict between foreign developers and rural landowners is reminiscent of a similar debate over the so-called Trans-Texas Corridor, a highly-controversial and similarly ambitious statewide transportation project  that dominated Texas politics for much of the last decade.  Following  intense opposition from conservative interest groups, state lawmakers, and rural landowners the project was ultimately abandoned.

“So many of our constitutional freedoms flow from the inherent right to own private property,” Said Senator Lois Kolkhorst (R-Brenham).  “Texans saw those rights threatened a few years ago with the Trans-Texas Corridor, and now we are seeing it again with the latest high-speed rail proposal.  That’s why I applaud any local efforts to push back against this project’s abuse of eminent domain.” 

About The Author

Related posts

2 Comments

  1. TG

    I’m glad the header correctly identified this as FOREIGN OWNED and that needs to be driven into the memory of every Texan. And you can bet your dwindling bank account if allowed to be built the infrastructure will be imported and the labor to build it will be Chinese nationals brought in for this project. Then after it fails financially the taxpayers will be forced to subsidize it as we do AMTRAK because the Democrats and establishment Republicans will say this “important” high speed rail is too big to fail.
    I loved how the mouthpiece for the rail didn’t want to be filmed so his words can be used on public record. He must be a politician or lawyer because he speaks with nothing but spin and double talk.
    I also add that the liberal justices on the Supreme Court in 2005 in the Kelo vs New London ruling, the government can take your property under eminent domain and give it to a private developer. This, of course, was not the intent of eminent domain as allowed by our founders. But along with this stupidity they did also rule states can enact legislate to block this theft of private property. Texas state government, stop this greed!

  2. DollyHorton

    I hope to God the greedy politicians among us choose NOT to do this, because if they do, they’re going to be out of jobs! The tide has already turned and the voters—who many of the more greedy among you think are just uneducated, uninformed ignorant trash— are sick to death of having foreigners ‘investing’ in our county, our state. “Investing” my big fat arse. It’s nothing more than a foreign take-over, period. What about the foreign investors in all the toll roads in the state? Oh, no one dares utter a peep about them, do they?

    There is a corrupt, utterly depraved group of politicians in the state that just want money money money, and yes, in THEIR personal pockets. No one can convince the electorate that they are not profiting personally from schemes like this. Politicians don’t become millionaires off salaries of $150,000 and $200,000 a year. No one is being fooled.

    Anyone greedy and depraved enough to agree to this plan to further sell out the state of Texas should be thoroughly investigated by an impartial, third party to see what they stand to get out of the deal. And anyone who tries to tell us voters that this would be somehow ‘good’ and ‘great’ for our state is not living in the same state the rest of us are. But then, since when have politicians had any idea of what reality is like?

Comments are closed.